Whether Maricopa County poll workers violated Arizona law by providing voters "sharpies" as ballot-marking devices, which allegedly caused markings to bleed through ballots and the ballots to be cancelled
Whether instructions sent by Pennsylvania's Secretary of State to county election officials about providing information to party and candidate representatives during the pre-canvass of voters whose ballots were rejected violated Pennsylvania law
Plaintiffs brought suit against the Registrar of Voters for Clark County. Technical difficulties resulted in several voting locations in Clark County failing to open at the required time of 7:00am. Plaintiffs asked for preliminary and permanent injunctive relief asking the Court to direct the Registrar to keep the affected locations open until 8:00pm, an hour later than their scheduled poll closing times.
U.S. Supreme Court (20-845) - This page includes U.S. Supreme Court documents for the related cases of In Re: 2,349 Ballots in the 2020 General Election; In Re: Canvass of Absentee and Mail-In Ballots; and In Re: November 3, 2020 General Election
Issue(s):
Whether the Philadelphia County Board of Elections provided meaningful access to the ballot canvassing process to political party observers
The petitioners challenges the authority of Minnesota Secretary of State's decision to count mail-in ballots received within seven days of the election as long as they are postmarked on or before election day, as well as a presume that mail-in ballots without a postmark were mailed on or before election day. The petitioners request the court order that late-arriving mail-in ballots be segregated.
Plaintiff alleges that the Defendant is violating Article I, section IV, clause 1 of the United States Constitution by encouraging and allowing registered voters to cast their votes via curbside drive-through voting.
Whether Nevada Secretary of State is required to submit a plan to the Clark County Registrar that ensures meaningful observation of the ballot-counting process
Whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court usurped the State Legislature and Congress's power in its recent decision, Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Boockvar
Whether the Election Code authorizes or requires county election boards to reject voted absentee or mail-in ballots during pre-canvassing and canvassing based on signature analysis where there are alleged or perceived signature variances.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
