Whether the court should issue a writ of mandamus ordering Governor Wolf to withdraw his certification of Pennsylvania's Presidential election results, as well as a temporary restraining order preventing the state's Democratic Presidential electors from casting votes in the Electoral College; The plaintiffs set forth various allegations in support of their complaint, including that the defendants failed to implement recommendations provided in a Performance Audit Report conducted by the Department of the Auditor General, and that the defendants disregarded the Pennsylvania election code in authorizing the counting of defective absentee and mail-in ballots
Whether Arizona election officials violated state and federal law in the administration of the state's November election; Among the petition's allegations are that officials did not enforce state law residency requirements, permitted "double voting," and created illegal disparities in ballot and drop box voting in demographically different areas of the state by their use of funds from Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg's Center for Tech and Civic Life; The petitioners, who are members of the Arizona Election Integrity Association, ask the court for an injunction preventing the certification of Arizona's Presidential election results and requiring the governor to certify Presidential electors selected by the legislature.
Whether the defendants, in the running of Arizona's election, violated the Elections and Electors Clauses, the Equal Protection Clause, and the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution, in addition to state election law; Allegations include fraud in the counting and fabrication of hundreds of thousands of illegal ballots, including fraud related to the use of Dominion Election Systems' hardware and software in Maricopa County; The complaint includes a request to decertify Arizona's Presidential election results.
Whether Wisconsin election officials unlawfully departed from the state legislative scheme for appointing Presidential electors; Allegations include (1) ignoring or compromising state law limits on the availability of mail-in ballots, (2) proliferating unmanned mail-in ballot drop boxes, (3) processing and counting vast numbers of mail-in ballots outside the visibility of poll watchers, (4) reducing or eliminating mandatory voter certifications for mail-in ballots, and (5) permitting "ballot tampering"; The plaintiff seeks a declaration that the defendants violated the Electors Clause as well as the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the U.S. Constitution, and for the court to remand the case to the Wisconsin legislature for the purpose of determining a remedy according to its authority under the Electors Clause
Whether issuing absentee ballots in-person to Wisconsin voters without an application violated state law; whether absentee ballots with incomplete certifications or on which city clerks filled in missing information violated state law; whether absentee ballots claiming "indefinite confinement status" after March 20, 2020 were invalid under state law; and whether stationing poll workers, receiving ballots, witnessing ballot certifications, and other clerk's office activity in Madison's "Democracy in the Park" events violated state law; and whether the defendants' alleged actions should result in the exclusion of certain absentee ballots from the state's vote count
Whether the defendants violated the Elections and Electors Clauses of the U.S. Constitution as well as 42 U.S.C. 1983 by contravening requirements in the Wisconsin Statutes such as a provision stating that absentee ballots should not be counted when their certificates are missing a witness address; whether the defendants violated the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution in their disparate treatment of absentee vs. mail-in voters; whether the defendants violated the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution by providing guidance in violation of the Wisconsin Statutes and by counting allegedly fraudulent and illegal votes; and whether the defendants' alleged conduct should require the decertification of Wisconsin's Presidential election results
Whether the defendant permitted non-residents to vote in the November election and failed to verify voter signatures as required by state law, and whether these alleged violations require either (1) an audit of the voter rolls and comparison to the ballots cast or (2) the decertification of Georgia's election results and an order for a new election
Whether the Wisconsin Elections Commission communicated illegal interpretations of Wisconsin law to county clerks around the state regarding absentee ballot drop boxes; whether the court should set aside ballots placed in these drop boxes; and whether the court should prevent the Wisconsin Elections Commission from certifying the state's results in the November election
Whether in administering Michigan's election, the respondents violated the petitioners' rights under the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the U.S. and Michigan Constitutions, in addition to violating Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution involving state legislatures' authority to appoint electors in such manner as the legislatures direct; and whether the alleged violations require the court to enjoin the respondents from finally certifying the election results
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
