U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (20-5352)
Issue(s):
Plaintiffs are challenging the recent United States Postal Service policy changes, contending that such changes are worsening issues caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and threatening local, state, and federal elections, including the upcoming presidential election.
Whether Ohio Secretary of State LaRose's directive limiting each Ohio county to a single secure drop box for absentee applications and ballots in the 2020 election is consistent with Ohio law.
Plaintiff States challenge the legality of defendant's actions regarding the operation of the United States Postal Service (USPS), arguing such actions are designated to undermine the effective operation of the USPS and impede the efforts of states to conduct fair and free elections.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington (1:20-cv-03127)
Issue(s):
Whether changes to the postal service system made by the Postmaster General which have caused delays in mail and diminished postal service capacity were made unconstitutionally and interfere with the right to vote.
Whether NJ Governor Philip Murphy's Executive Order mandating NJ's November General Election to be conducted primarily via vote-by-mail ballots and allowing for every vote-by-mail ballot postmarked on or before November 3, 2020 and received by November 10, 2020 to be counted is unconstitutional and in violation of federal statutes.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (20-cv-6516)
Issue(s):
Plaintiff challenges the legality of recent policy changes to the United States Postal Service in light of the COVID-19 pandemic and presidential election.
The plaintiffs challenge Texas’s effort to end straight-ticket voting, as burdening Texans' right to vote under normal circumstances and this November would increase voters’ exposure to Covid-19.
Improper Election Administration, Polling Place Challenges
Most Recent Court:
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (Case 1:20-cv-03263)
Issue(s):
Plaintiffs filed complaint in response to the long lines and waiting times experienced by Georgia voters during the primary due to closure and consolidation of polling locations and inadequate election equipment and training.
U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada (Case 2:20-cv-01445)
Issue(s):
Whether recent legislative changes to Nevada's election procedures, including the acceptance of ballots received after Election Day, violate federal election statutes as well as the Supremacy and Equal Protection Clauses of the U.S. Constitution.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
