Whether Pennsylvania law prohibited the Philadelphia County Board of Elections from counting 8,329 absentee and mail-in ballots containing technical defects such as a missing date next to a signature, a missing printed name of the voter, and a missing street address for the voter
Whether the Bucks County Board of Elections violated Pennsylvania law by counting 2,177 absentee and mail-in ballots due to deficiencies such as the secrecy envelope being unsealed
U.S. Supreme Court (20-845) - This page includes U.S. Supreme Court documents for the related cases of In Re: 2,349 Ballots in the 2020 General Election; In Re: Canvass of Absentee and Mail-In Ballots; and In Re: November 3, 2020 General Election
Issue(s):
Whether the Philadelphia County Board of Elections provided meaningful access to the ballot canvassing process to political party observers
Whether the Chatham County Board of Elections failed to safely store absentee ballots received after 7:00 p.m. on Election Day and counted absentee ballots received after 7:00 p.m. on Election Day, in violation of Georgia law
Whether the defendants violated the Elections and Electors Clauses of the U.S. Constitution as well as 42 U.S.C. 1983 by contravening requirements in the Wisconsin Statutes such as a provision stating that absentee ballots should not be counted when their certificates are missing a witness address; whether the defendants violated the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution in their disparate treatment of absentee vs. mail-in voters; whether the defendants violated the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution by providing guidance in violation of the Wisconsin Statutes and by counting allegedly fraudulent and illegal votes; and whether the defendants' alleged conduct should require the decertification of Wisconsin's Presidential election results
Whether the Election Code authorizes or requires county election boards to reject voted absentee or mail-in ballots during pre-canvassing and canvassing based on signature analysis where there are alleged or perceived signature variances.
Whether the defendants violated various state and federal laws by such alleged conduct as permitting early processing of absentee ballots without legislative authorization, allowing voting by individuals no longer residing in the state, failing to develop auditable procedures for the processing of absentee ballots, failing to provide meaningful access for party representatives to observe and monitor the electoral process, treating absentee voters in some counties differently than absentee voters in other counties, and employing tools such as Dominion Democracy Suite software and devices that allegedly led to statewide ballot fraud; Whether the defendants' alleged conduct should result in the decertification of the Presidential election results in Georgia
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (Case 19-14552)
Issue(s):
Plaintiffs challenge Florida's law mandating that candidates of the political party of the Governor be listed first on the ballot, alleging that it gives an unfair advantage.
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan (1:20-cv-01098)
Issue(s):
Whether the federal district court should enjoin certification of Michigan’s popular vote in the presidential election on the ground that the state’s procedures for absentee voting were unconstitutional.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.