Major Pending Election Cases

Moore v. Harper

SCOTUS Watchlist:

Yes

Filing Date:

November 16, 2021

Status:

resolved

State:

North Carolina

Topic:

Redistricting

Most Recent Court:

U.S. Supreme Court

Issue(s):

Whether the North Carolina Supreme Court unlawfully nullified the state legislature's regulations governing the “Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives" under Article I, section 4, clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution, based on state constitutional provisions vesting the state judiciary with power to prescribe rules ensuring a “fair” and “free” election

Mueller v. Wisconsin Election Commissioners

Filing Date:

November 27, 2020

Status:

resolved

State:

Wisconsin

Topics:

2020 Presidential Election Case, Absentee Ballots, Improper Election Administration

Most Recent Court:

Wisconsin Supreme Court (2020AP001958 - OA)

Issue(s):

Whether the Wisconsin Elections Commission communicated illegal interpretations of Wisconsin law to county clerks around the state regarding absentee ballot drop boxes; whether the court should set aside ballots placed in these drop boxes; and whether the court should prevent the Wisconsin Elections Commission from certifying the state's results in the November election

Mussi v. Fontes

Filing Date:

June 3, 2024

Status:

resolved

State:

Arizona

Most Recent Court:

District of Arizona

Issue(s):

Gina Swoboda and Scott Mussi, Chair of the Republican Party and President of Arizona Free Enterprise respectively, are challenging Arizona voter roll maintenance policy. Plaintiffs allege that Arizona's lack of a voter-list maintenance program has resulted in voter over-enrollment in violation of Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act. Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief to order the development of a voter-list maintenance program.

Neiman v. LaRose

Filing Date:

March 21, 2022

Status:

resolved

State:

Ohio

Topic:

Redistricting

Most Recent Court:

Supreme Court of Ohio (2022-0298); Case consolidated with League of Women Voters of Ohio v. LaRose (2020-0303); Going forward, new filings will only be added to that case.

Issue(s):

Whether Ohio's Congressional Districting Plan adopted March 2, 2022 violates Article XIX of the Ohio Constitution

Nelson v. Griffin-Valade

Filing Date:

December 6, 2023

Status:

resolved

State:

Oregon

Topic:

14th Amendment Disqualification

Most Recent Court:

Oregon Supreme Court

Issue(s):

Whether former President Trump is disqualified from running for President due to engaging in insurrection or rebellion in violation of section 3 of the 14th Amendment.

New Georgia Project v. Raffensperger

Filing Date:

May 8, 2020

Status:

resolved

State:

Georgia

Topic:

Improper Election Administration

Most Recent Court:

Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals (20-13360)

Issue(s):

Due to the issues presented by the coronavirus pandemic, the plaintiffs are challenging four election policies that they argue risk disenfranchising thousands of Georgia voters: (1) the lack of standards governing the process for notifying voters regarding incomplete absentee ballot applications; (2) the failure to provide prepaid postage on absentee ballots; (3) the rejection of absentee ballots received after 7:00 p.m. on Election Day; and (4) Georgia’s prohibition on third-party assistance for absentee ballots.

North Carolina Alliance for Retired Americans v. Hirsch

Filing Date:

October 2, 2023

Status:

resolved

State:

North Carolina

Most Recent Court:

Middle District of North Carolina (No. 1:23-cv-00837)

Issue(s):

Lawsuit challenging a North Carolina law that requires voter to reside in the state for at least 30 days before the election in which they seek to vote. Plaintiffs allege that 30 days is longer than the registration deadline and therefore voters who move to the state within 30 days of election day are prevented from voting in Presidential elections even though the state allows registrations 20 days before election day and through the Saturday before election day. Plaintiffs argue this violates Section 202 of the VRA, which prohibits states from preventing eligible voters from voting in Presidential election based on how long they have resided in the state before election day.

Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless v. LaRose

Filing Date:

January 6, 2023

Status:

resolved

State:

Ohio

Topics:

Mail-In Voting, Voter ID

Most Recent Court:

United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (No. 1:23-cv-26)

Issue(s):

Lawsuit challenging several provisions of Ohio Senate Bill 458. The bill creates a photo ID requirement and eliminates a list of previously acceptable IDs, moves up the deadline to cure provisional and rejected mail-in ballots from seven to four days after election day and moves up the date to return mail-in ballots from ten to four days after election day. The plaintiffs contend that the bill severely restricts access to the poll, particularly for young, elderly, Black and overseas voters. They argue that the law is thus in violation of the 1st and 14th Amendments of the US Constitution.

O’Halloran v. Benson

Filing Date:

September 28, 2022

Status:

resolved

State:

Michigan

Topic:

Polling Place Challengers

Most Recent Court:

Michigan Supreme Court (22-000162-MZ)

Issue(s):

Lawsuit challenging several new rules, set by the Secretary of State, concerning partisan election challengers are in violation of state law. These new rules include a requirement that every polling place have a challenger liaison, a restriction that only permits election challengers to communicate with challenger liaison, a regulation authorizing election inspectors to not record impermissible challenges, and a rule allowing challengers to be ejected from failing to follow instructions.

O’Rourke v. Dominion Voting Systems, Inc.

Filing Date:

December 12, 2020

Status:

resolved

State:

Colorado

Most Recent Court:

Dist. Colorado (No. 1:20-cv-03747)

Issue(s):

Plaintiffs brought claims against Dominion Voting Systems, Facebook, the Center for Tech and Civic Life and several governors and secretaries of state alleging that they burdened the voting rights of 160 million people during the 2020 election. Specifically, they alleged the defendants changed voting laws without legislative approval, used unreliable voting machines, altered votes, provided illegal methods of voting, and counted illegal votes. The District Court granted the motions to dismiss filed by the defendants.

CASE TRACKER