Whether Arizona election officials violated state and federal law in the administration of the state's November election; Among the petition's allegations are that officials did not enforce state law residency requirements, permitted "double voting," and created illegal disparities in ballot and drop box voting in demographically different areas of the state by their use of funds from Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg's Center for Tech and Civic Life; The petitioners, who are members of the Arizona Election Integrity Association, ask the court for an injunction preventing the certification of Arizona's Presidential election results and requiring the governor to certify Presidential electors selected by the legislature.
Whether the respondents violated the Georgia Constitution and election statutes in the running of the November election; The petitioners seek the decertification of all election results in Coffee County as well as the Presidential election results statewide.
Whether the defendant failed to ensure that representatives of both political parties were present at the Absent Vote Counting Board as required by Michigan law, and whether the defendant unlawfully "cured" deficient ballots
U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada (2:20-cv-02046)
Issue(s):
Whether the Clark County Registrar of Voters should be required to cease using the Agilis software system and have clerks check each mail-in ballot to determine its validity
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas (Case 5:16-cv-00257)
Issue(s):
Whether Texas's administration of its online driver registration database violates the “Motor Voter” provisions of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 and the U.S. Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection by not providing a location to change one's address for voter registration purposes when updating address for licensure reasons.
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin (Case 3:20-cv-00459)
Issue(s):
Plaintiffs are suing to obtain an order requiring Defendants to administer impending elections in a manner that will not, as Plaintiffs contend the state did in April, violate eligible voters’ federally protected rights to participate in those elections.
The plaintiffs challenge Texas’s effort to end straight-ticket voting, as burdening Texans' right to vote under normal circumstances and this November would increase voters’ exposure to Covid-19.
Texas Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth Judicial Circuit (Case 14-20-00358)
Issue(s):
Plaintiffs are asking for a relaxing of the vote by mail requirements to allow any eligible voter, regardless of age and physical condition, to request, receive and have counted, a mail-in ballot if they believe they should practice social distancing.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
