Major Pending Election Cases

Jones v. DeSantis

Filing Date:

June 28, 2019

Status:

resolved

State:

Florida

Topics:

Felon Voting Rights, Voter Suppression, Voting Rights Act

Most Recent Court:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (Case 20-12003)

Issue(s):

Plaintiffs challenge Florida's requirement that payment of all restitution, fees, or fines ordered by the court as part of the sentence is a condition of voting rights restoration, arguing that the requirement violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the Twenty-Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the Voting Rights Act, and Article VI, Section 4 of the Florida Constitution.

Fair Fight Action v. Raffensperger

Filing Date:

November 27, 2018

Status:

resolved

State:

Georgia

Topic:

Voter Suppression

Most Recent Court:

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (Case 1:18-cv-05391)

Issue(s):

Whether the Secretary of State's office and the state election board systematically blocked minority voters from the polls in the Nov. 6th, 2018 election.

Secretary, State of Georgia v. Common Cause Georgia

Filing Date:

November 5, 2018

Status:

resolved

State:

Georgia

Topic:

State Voter Registration Databases

Most Recent Court:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit (Case 20-12388)

Issue(s):

Whether Georgia's maintenance of an allegedly unsecure voter registration database violates the 14th Amendment, the Help America Vote Act, the Georgia Constitution, and Georgia statutory law.

Georgia Coalition for the Peoples’ Agenda v. Raffensperger

Filing Date:

October 11, 2018

Status:

resolved

State:

Georgia

Topic:

Voter Registration

Most Recent Court:

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (Case 1:18-cv-04727)

Issue(s):

Whether Georgia's exact-match voter registration protocol violates the Voting Rights Act and the National Voter Registration Act, as well as the First and Fourteenth Amendments.

Jacobson v. Lee

Filing Date:

May 24, 2018

Status:

resolved

State:

Florida

Topic:

Ballot Design

Most Recent Court:

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (Case 19-14552)

Issue(s):

Plaintiffs challenge Florida's law mandating that candidates of the political party of the Governor be listed first on the ballot, alleging that it gives an unfair advantage.

Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee

SCOTUS Watchlist:

Yes

Filing Date:

April 15, 2016

Status:

resolved

State:

Arizona

Topics:

Absentee Ballots, Provisional Ballots, Voter Suppression

Most Recent Court:

U.S. Supreme Court (Case 19-1258 and 19-1257)

Issue(s):

Whether Arizona's policy of not counting out-of-precinct provisional ballots violates section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Whether an Arizona law prohibiting individuals from collecting the early ballots of others (aka "ballot harvesting") violates section 2 the Voting Rights Act because it disproportionately and adversely impacts minorities and unjustifiably burdens the right to vote.

One Wisconsin Institute v. Thomsen

Filing Date:

May 29, 2015

Status:

resolved

State:

Wisconsin

Topics:

Absentee Ballots, Equal Protections Clause, Voter ID, Voter Suppression, Voting Rights Act

Most Recent Court:

7th Circuit Court of Appeals (16-03091)

Issue(s):

Lawsuit which challenged aspects of Wisconsin's election laws, particularly its laws limiting early voting locations, reducing the early vote period, restricting vote registration, increasing residency requirements, invasive poll monitoring, the elimination of straight-ticket voting, changes to absentee voting, and Wisconsin's voter ID law. The plaintiffs claimed that the laws violated Section 2 of the VRA, the 1st Amendment, the Equal Protections Clause, the 15th Amendment, and the 26th Amendment.

Arizona v. House of Representatives of the Congress of the United States of America

Filing Date:

January 1, 1970

Status:

resolved

State:

Most Recent Court:

District Court of the District of Columbia

Issue(s):

The State of Arizona and Adelita Grijalva (Representative-elect for Arizona’s 7th Congressional District) sue the U.S. House of Representatives, House Clerk Kevin McCumber, and Sergeant-at-Arms William McFarland. They allege that Speaker Mike Johnson unlawfully refused to administer the oath of office to Ms. Grijalva—despite her uncontested election and clear constitutional qualifications—thereby denying Arizona full congressional representation.

Kormanik v. Wisconsin Elections Commission

Filing Date:

January 1, 1970

Status:

pending

State:

Callais v. Landry

Filing Date:

January 1, 1970

State:

Louisiana

Topic:

Redistricting

Most Recent Court:

United States Supreme Court

Issue(s):

The Plaintiffs challenge Louisiana’s 2024 congressional redistricting law (SB8), alleging that the state intentionally used race as the primary factor in drawing district boundaries in violation of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. The plaintiffs argue that the legislature rushed SB8 through in eight days with the explicit goal of creating two majority-Black congressional districts, Districts 2 and 6, by linking geographically distant Black populations across the state while ignoring traditional redistricting principles such as compactness, communities of interest, and contiguity. According to the complaint, the resulting districts are unusually shaped and connect distant cities in a way that divides local communities and segregates voters based on race. The plaintiffs contend that legislative statements and the structure of the map itself demonstrate that race was the predominant factor in drawing all six districts, amounting to unconstitutional racial gerrymandering and intentional discrimination that dilutes or segregates voters. Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief preventing the map from being used.

CASE TRACKER