Plaintiff States challenge the legality of defendant's actions regarding the operation of the United States Postal Service (USPS), arguing such actions are designated to undermine the effective operation of the USPS and impede the efforts of states to conduct fair and free elections.
Whether Ohio Secretary of State LaRose's directive limiting each Ohio county to a single secure drop box for absentee applications and ballots in the 2020 election is consistent with Ohio law.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (20-5352)
Issue(s):
Plaintiffs are challenging the recent United States Postal Service policy changes, contending that such changes are worsening issues caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and threatening local, state, and federal elections, including the upcoming presidential election.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (20-4063)
Issue(s):
Whether Ohio Secretary of State LaRose's directive limiting each Ohio county to a single secure drop box for absentee applications and ballots in the 2020 election violates the fundamental right to vote under the First and Fourteenth Amendments, and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (20-16890)
Issue(s):
Whether Arizona’s requirement that Vote By Mail ballots be received – not postmarked – before 7:00 pm on November 3, 2020 (Election Day) to be counted is an unconstitutional burden on Plaintiffs’ right to vote at Navajo Nation as applied during the COVID-19 pandemic and United States Postal Service reorganizational issues.
Whether the court should enjoin Nevada's Secretary of State from certifying the state's election results due to widespread fraud enabled by unconstitutional mail-in ballot legislation
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (20-03139)
Issue(s):
Whether absentee ballots received up to eight days after Election Day without a post mark can constitutionally be counted in the election. Whether the Secretary of the State of Minnesota can change the mail-in ballot deadline by a court approved agreement.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit (20-2107)
Issue(s):
Whether the North Carolina Board of Elections usurped the Legislature's authority with its September 22, 2020 Memoranda setting new "Times" and "Manners" for elections.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit (20-02104, 20-02107)
Issue(s):
Whether the "Consent Order" and associated memoranda regulating the Times, Places, and Manner of holding Elections negotiated by the North Carolina Board of Elections exceeds its authority.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
