CASE TRACKER

The RNC is challenging Nevada's policy of counting non-postmarked ballots received within three days of Election Day. Plaintiffs argue that the described policy violates existing Nevada law requiring ballots to be postmarked and submitted on or before Election Day. The complaint sets out a prayer for both declaratory and injunctive relief to block non-postmarked ballots from being counted in the November 2024 election.

Gina Swoboda and Scott Mussi, Chair of the Republican Party and President of Arizona Free Enterprise respectively, are challenging Arizona voter roll maintenance policy. Plaintiffs allege that Arizona's lack of a voter-list maintenance program has resulted in voter over-enrollment in violation of Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act. Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief to order the development of a voter-list maintenance program.

PARA is challenging Lancaster County policy disqualifying mail-in ballots missing the final two digits of the calendar year, alleging the policy violates the non-discrimination clause of the State Constitution of Pennsylvania. Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief to permit ballots with incomplete dates in the November 2024 general election.

United Sovereign Americans are challenging Pennsylvanian voter-roll maintenance policies, alleging that the number of vote-tabulation errors and registration discrepancies violate the Help America Vote Act, the National Voter Registration Act, and Pennsylvania law. Plaintiffs seek a writ of mandamus compelling investigation into the alleged discrepancies and policy changes to rectify them.

The Public Interest Law Foundation is challenging Clark County voter-roll maintenance policies, alleging that voter registration tied to commercial addresses violates Nevada state law. Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief to investigate alleged discrepancies and update voter rolls.

American Encore and other plaintiffs are challenging Arizona policy prohibiting political activity near polling sites and permitting the Arizona Secretary of State to conduct voting canvasses and certify statewide election results. Plaintiffs allege said policies violate the First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief to prevent the enforcement of the contested policies.

The AFPI is suing the Biden administration regarding Executive Order 14019. Plaintiffs allege that the contested executive order compromises the authority states hold to conduct elections by requiring federal agencies to develop voter registration programs. The AFPI seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to strike Executive Order 14019 down as unconstitutional and block federal agencies from developing and implementing voter registration programs.

The RNC is challenging the executive order of Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer designating several federal and state entities as voter registration agencies. Plaintiffs allege that the governor of Michigan lacks the legal authority to do so under Michigan law, claiming that the executive order violates the National Voter Registration Act and several Michigan state laws. Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief to remove VRA status from agencies impacted by the executive order and to render any future executive orders granting VRA status invalid.

The DNC is filing suit against the Georgia State Election board to challenge the recently-enacted "Reasonable Inquiry Rule" for election certifications. Plaintiffs argue that the rule violates Georgia state law mandating election result certification before a deadline, seeking either declaratory relief rendering the rule invalid or injunctive relief limiting the scope of inquiries in order to ensure election certification can be accomplished by deadline.